Can Philosophy Help Young Adults Find Direction?

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Yes. Can philosophy help young adults? It can, especially when life feels crowded with options yet strangely short on direction.

Philosophy will not choose a career, repair a friendship, or remove the pressure of rent, work, and expectation. What it can do is train a person to see the questions beneath those pressures. It gives young adults a way to ask: What am I trying to become? Which desires are truly mine? What kind of suffering is worth enduring?

Those questions are not decorative. They shape a life.

Why young adulthood feels disorienting

Young adulthood often arrives with a peculiar demand: make permanent choices while still learning who you are. Choose a field. Build a public identity. Find your people. Develop taste. Make enough money. Seem confident while privately wondering whether confidence is just another performance.

The culture offers a flood of answers, most of them quick and marketable. Be productive. Be visible. Turn every interest into a personal brand. Treat uncertainty as a defect that must be corrected before anyone notices. A person can absorb these commands for years without asking who benefits from them or whether they lead anywhere worth going.

Philosophy interrupts that momentum. It slows the rush to imitate. It treats confusion as material for thought rather than evidence of failure.

That does not make it comfortable. Honest reflection can expose how much of a person's ambition comes from fear, envy, or the need for approval. But false clarity has a cost too. Many people discover, after years of effort, that they were chasing a life they never consciously chose.

Use philosophy to question borrowed goals

A young adult does not need to begin with a shelf of difficult books or a vocabulary designed to impress strangers. The starting point is simpler: identify the beliefs that already govern your choices.

Maybe you believe a worthwhile life must look impressive from the outside. Maybe you assume that financial success proves character. Maybe you have learned to treat rest as guilt, sincerity as weakness, or artistic ambition as an indulgence reserved for someone else. These beliefs often arrive before examination. Family habits, school systems, social media, and workplace culture plant them quietly.

Philosophy asks where such beliefs came from and whether they deserve authority. Socrates built much of his work around this kind of examination. He did not promise easy certainty. He pressed people to explain what they meant by justice, courage, friendship, and a good life. His method remains useful because vague words can run a whole life if no one challenges them.

Take the word “success.” Write down what it means to you without trying to sound admirable. Then ask whether your definition would still hold if nobody could see your achievements. Ask what you would regret failing to attempt. Ask what sort of person your goals require you to become.

The answers may change. That is the point.

Build judgment instead of collecting advice

Advice is everywhere. Judgment is rarer.

Advice tells you what worked for somebody else under conditions you may not share. Judgment helps you read your own conditions clearly. It helps you tell the difference between a hard season that deserves endurance and a path that is draining your life for no meaningful reason.

Aristotle described character as something formed through repeated action. You become reliable by practicing reliability, generous by practicing generosity, disciplined by practicing discipline. The idea can sound obvious, yet it resists a common fantasy: that identity is discovered once, then preserved like a profile page.

A life is built through habits. So is a personality.

For young adults, this has practical force. If you want to become a musician, writer, teacher, organizer, or attentive friend, the question is not whether you already feel like that person. The question is what actions give that identity a body. One hour of serious practice says more than a week spent waiting for confidence.

Still, Aristotle should not be read as a machine for self-optimization. Habit without reflection becomes another prison. A person can become efficient at work they hate, charming in relationships that lack honesty, or highly skilled at avoiding themselves. Judgment requires both action and periodic review.

Let uncertainty become part of the work

Many young adults are taught to fear uncertainty because it delays the appearance of arrival. Yet uncertainty is often the honest condition of a person who is paying attention.

Existential thinkers took this seriously. They saw that freedom can feel less like a bright open field and more like standing before a series of choices with no guarantee that any one choice will save you. There is no perfect script. There are consequences, missed chances, revisions, and the uncomfortable fact that no one else can fully live your life for you.

This is not an argument for paralysis. It is an argument against waiting for perfect certainty before acting.

You may not know whether a creative pursuit will become a career. You may not know whether moving cities will make you happier. You may not know if a relationship can survive a change in values. Philosophy does not erase these risks. It can stop you from disguising fear as wisdom.

Nietzsche, often reduced to slogans about power, was sharper than that. He asked people to question inherited moral habits and create a more conscious relation to their own values. His thought carries danger when used as an excuse for arrogance or selfishness. Read carelessly, it can become a permission slip for contempt. Read seriously, it asks a harder thing: can you take responsibility for the shape of your life rather than hiding behind convention?

Learn to live with contradiction

A young person can want security and freedom. They can care about money and still refuse to make money the measure of every hour. They can love popular music while demanding more from it than repetition and noise. They can want intimacy while needing solitude.

These tensions do not always need immediate resolution. Sometimes they need language.

Philosophy gives language to experiences that otherwise become private fog. A person who understands the difference between pleasure and fulfillment can see why endless entertainment leaves them flat. A person who distinguishes loneliness from solitude can stop treating every quiet evening as proof that something has gone wrong. A person who sees the difference between guilt and responsibility can make amends without turning self-punishment into a personality.

This is where philosophy meets art. A song, film, or novel can register a contradiction before an argument explains it. Art gives feeling a form. Philosophy asks what that form means and what it demands from the listener. Together, they protect experience from becoming mere content.

Practice philosophy in ordinary life

The best use of philosophy is not to win arguments at a dinner table. It is to become less easily manipulated by your own impulses and by the noise around you.

Start with a small practice. At the end of a difficult week, ask yourself three questions in writing: What did I avoid? What did I pursue? What value was active in those choices? Do not rush to make the answers flattering.

When you make a major decision, name the trade-off plainly. A stable job may limit time for art. A risky project may strain your finances. Leaving a familiar group may bring relief and loneliness at once. Clear thinking does not remove the price of a decision. It prevents you from pretending there is no price.

Read slowly as well. One serious essay or a few pages from a demanding thinker can matter more than a month of quotations passed around for appearance. Keep a pencil nearby. Argue in the margins. If a writer makes a claim about human nature, test it against your own conduct, your friendships, your work, and the culture you consume.

Philosophy becomes real when it changes the quality of your attention.

Know its limits

Philosophy cannot carry every burden. Some problems need practical support, skilled care, direct conversation, rest, or a change in material conditions. Thinking can turn into avoidance when it becomes a way to analyze life instead of living it.

There is also a social trap in philosophical seriousness. A young adult may use difficult ideas to feel superior to people who seem less reflective. That posture is usually insecurity dressed as intelligence. If philosophy makes you incapable of listening, less generous toward ordinary people, or detached from actual feeling, it has become another mask.

The stronger result is humility. You see how limited your knowledge is, how mixed your motives can be, and how much patience other people deserve. You still form convictions. You simply stop confusing conviction with certainty.

A useful philosophy does not hand young adults a finished identity. It gives them the nerve to build one with open eyes. That work takes time, and it will never look fully settled from the inside. Keep asking better questions anyway. A life becomes more your own each time you refuse an easy answer that does not tell the truth.

The Philosophy of Personal Destiny and Choice

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

The philosophy of personal destiny holds that a life is shaped by the meeting of circumstance, character, choice, and consequence. It rejects the comforting fantasy that we control everything, yet it refuses the weaker fantasy that we control nothing.

Most people meet the question of destiny at a difficult moment: after a rejection, a move, a betrayal, a failure that seems too large to explain. They ask whether this was meant to happen, though what they often mean is simpler and more urgent: What can I do with what happened?

That question deserves more than a slogan about following your dreams. Dreams are cheap when they have never been tested by time, work, or loss. Destiny becomes interesting when it stops being a prediction and becomes a way of judging how a person answers the material of their own life.

Define destiny honestly

Personal destiny is not a hidden script waiting in a drawer somewhere. If it were, reflection would be little more than theater. Your decisions, habits, refusals, loyalties, and acts of attention would carry no real weight.

Yet the opposite picture is false as well. Nobody begins from a blank page. We arrive with a body, a temperament, a family history, a place, a set of injuries, certain advantages, and a period of history that places pressures on us before we can name them. A person raised around instability may learn vigilance early. A young musician may hear possibility in sounds that others treat as noise. Another person may carry a talent that receives no audience for years.

These conditions are real. They shape the field. They do not tell us every move we must make within it.

The philosophy of personal destiny begins with this tension. A person is formed by forces they did not choose, then judged in part by what they do with them. That is not always fair. It is, however, close to the actual texture of life.

Separate fate from responsibility

Fate names what arrives without asking permission. A diagnosis, an accident, a closed door, a parent’s absence, a chance encounter, a talent one never requested: these belong to the part of life that exceeds personal control. Pretending otherwise turns philosophy into accusation. It tells suffering people that they somehow authored every wound.

Responsibility begins elsewhere. It concerns the response after the fact. You may not choose the first blow, but you still face the question of what kind of person the blow will make possible. Some responses are immediate and practical: leave a damaging situation, find work, practice the instrument, tell the truth. Others take years: stop repeating an inherited cruelty, forgive without excusing, build a discipline strong enough to outlast a bad season.

This does not mean every hardship contains a lesson. Some events are simply damaging. Forcing meaning onto pain can become another form of dishonesty. But meaning can be made later through conduct. The event may not have been chosen. The interpretation, and the next act, still belong partly to you.

Treat character as a practice

People often speak of character as if it were a fixed possession. Someone is disciplined, weak, gifted, shallow, brave. These labels can describe a pattern, but they easily become a prison. A person who says, “I am just not confident,” may be reporting a real feeling while quietly turning it into an identity.

Character is more active than that. It grows through repeated acts, especially the small acts nobody applauds. You become reliable by keeping ordinary commitments. You develop taste by refusing what is easy and empty often enough that your standards gain strength. You learn courage by doing the next difficult thing before you feel ready.

Nietzsche remains useful here because he treated self-creation as a demanding task rather than a pleasant affirmation. He did not ask people to invent a cheerful story about themselves. He asked them to confront what they had become and to shape a higher form through discipline, struggle, and honest valuation.

That language can sound severe. It should. A life directed only by comfort becomes narrow. Still, severity without compassion becomes vanity. A person has limits, fatigue, grief, and needs they cannot bully out of existence. The work is to demand more from yourself without treating yourself as a machine.

Choose what you repeat

A destiny is rarely decided in one dramatic scene. It is assembled through repetitions: the conversations you return to, the art you consume, the people whose approval you seek, the work you postpone, the standards you accept when no one is watching.

This is why taste matters. Taste is not a decorative preference for refined objects. It is an education of attention. What you repeatedly admire teaches you what you will tolerate in your own work and relationships. If your attention is constantly fragmented, irony may become your only defense against sincerity. If you keep company with serious work, you begin to feel the difference between a pose and a voice.

A creative person should take this personally. Your influences are not merely references. They are votes for the kind of inner world you are building.

Make room for chance

Modern self-help often turns life into a private business plan. Set the goal, track the habit, optimize the result. There is value in planning, especially for people who have lived without structure. But the idea breaks down when it treats chance as a personal failure.

Chance rearranges lives. You meet someone at the right moment. A project fails and sends you toward better work. A missed opportunity frees time for a relationship or an artistic direction that changes your sense of self. None of this proves that life has arranged a neat design. It shows that human beings live inside conditions too large for their plans.

The mature response is neither worship of chance nor resentment toward it. It is readiness. Preparation cannot command an opportunity to appear, but it can make you less likely to waste one when it does. Practice may seem private and unnoticed until the day it becomes the difference between having something to say and having only an excuse.

Refuse borrowed destinies

Many people do not fail to choose a destiny. They choose one that was handed to them without examination. They pursue prestige because their peers recognize it. They copy an aesthetic because it provides instant belonging. They let fear dress itself up as practicality.

A borrowed destiny can look successful from the outside. It may produce money, praise, followers, or a respectable biography. Yet a person can feel estranged inside a life that receives approval. The unease is not always proof that they should burn everything down. Sometimes it signals a need for adjustment, patience, or better boundaries. But it should be heard.

The question is not, “What would impress people?” A harder question is, “What kind of effort could I respect after the applause is gone?” That question cuts through a great deal of noise.

For some, the answer points toward art. For others, it points toward craft, study, care for family, physical work, teaching, or a quieter life built around a few serious commitments. Destiny does not require spectacle. It requires a relation between your values and your conduct.

Accept the unfinished life

The desire to know one’s destiny often carries a desire to end uncertainty. People want a sign that their suffering will add up, that their ability has a proper destination, that they have not wasted too much time. No philosophy can give that guarantee without becoming false.

What it can offer is a firmer way to live without one. A person can admit uncertainty and still choose. They can make a serious commitment while knowing it may change them. They can start late. They can revise a self-image that once felt permanent. They can stop waiting to feel chosen.

Personal destiny is not the story of discovering a single, prewritten identity. It is the slower work of becoming answerable for the life you are making, while keeping faith with the parts of reality you cannot command.

The next honest act may be modest: make the call, finish the page, leave the performance behind, practice in private, or sit long enough to hear what you have been avoiding. A life changes direction there, before anyone has a name for it.

Navigating Creative Burnout Without Losing Your Voice

 Dess Dermondy rock music

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Navigating creative burnout begins by refusing to treat every dry spell as a failure of character. Step back from the demand to produce, identify what has been drained, and rebuild a working life that does not consume the person making the work.

Creative burnout feels especially brutal because it strikes at identity. A musician who cannot hear a melody, a writer who distrusts every sentence, or a visual artist who cannot stand the sight of the studio may feel that something private has gone missing. The danger is that we turn this condition into a verdict: I was never an artist, I have lost my gift, I am finished.

That verdict is usually false. Burnout is not proof that the work meant nothing. More often, it is proof that too much has been asked of one part of the self for too long.

Name what is happening

Burnout is not simple tiredness. Rest can help tiredness. Burnout carries a darker mixture of exhaustion, resentment, numbness, and self-contempt. You may still have ideas, yet feel physically unable to approach them. Or you may keep working while feeling detached from every result.

This distinction matters because many creative people answer burnout with more discipline. They add a stricter schedule, set harsher quotas, and punish themselves for failing to meet them. Discipline has a place. No serious body of work appears through mood alone. But discipline becomes self-destruction when it treats depletion as laziness.

Ask a plainer question: what exactly has become unbearable? The blank page may not be the real problem. Perhaps you have been making work under constant judgment. Perhaps every project has been tied to public response, money, career pressure, or the need to prove your intelligence. Perhaps you have stopped encountering art that feeds you because you are too busy trying to become content yourself.

The answer may also be more ordinary. Poor sleep, unstable routines, grief, isolation, and a job that takes all your attention can strip art of its available energy. There is no honor in calling this weakness.

Stop feeding the performance

Modern creative life encourages a strange confusion. It tells artists that they must create, document the creation, explain the creation, circulate the explanation, and remain visibly grateful for the attention. The work begins to live under surveillance.

A song becomes a post before it becomes a song. A thought becomes a position before it has had time to become a thought. This can produce output, but output is not the same as artistic life.

If you are burned out, reduce the audience for a while. Do not announce a grand disappearance. Simply make some part of your practice private again. Write pages no one will read. Play an instrument without recording it. Visit a museum, a used bookstore, or a local show without converting the experience into material.

Privacy gives taste room to return. Taste is easily distorted when every choice anticipates approval. You begin to select what will travel well rather than what seems true, strange, funny, painful, or formally alive. Over time, the artist becomes a manager of reactions.

There is a trade-off here. Sharing work can build relationships and create real opportunity. Withdrawal can become avoidance if it lasts forever. The point is not to reject an audience. The point is to stop making the audience the permanent witness inside your head.

Change the conditions

Burnout often survives because the conditions that caused it remain untouched. A two-day break cannot repair a life organized around permanent extraction.

Look at the actual shape of your week. When do you make things? When do you consume noise? When do you encounter silence? How often do you work without interruption? The answers may be unpleasant, but they are more useful than vague promises to be inspired again.

Change one condition that has real weight. Set a boundary around your most alert hour. Move your materials out of the place associated with obligation. Take social media off your phone for a month. Stop accepting every small request that borrows from the attention your work needs. If a project has become poisonous, put it away rather than dragging it through another season of forced labor.

Do not confuse suffering with seriousness. Some difficult work is worth finishing because difficulty belongs to its form. A novel may require years. A record may demand revision until the original confidence disappears. Yet there is a difference between the resistance of a demanding project and the deadening pressure of a project that no longer has any claim on you.

The question is not, “Can I force myself to finish?” The better question is, “What kind of person will this way of working produce?” Art is made by a person, and the person is not raw material.

Return through smaller work

When the larger practice feels impossible, make the assignment smaller than your pride. This is not a retreat from ambition. It is a way of restoring contact.

Write one paragraph about a street you know. Record thirty seconds of sound from your room. Copy a passage from a writer whose sentences still make you alert. Make a bad sketch. Learn four bars of a song. Describe a face from memory. Give yourself a task with an ending.

Small work interrupts the fantasy that every artistic act must justify your existence. It brings the hand back into contact with the material. A sentence can be revised. A chord can be tried again. A page can be thrown away without becoming evidence against your future.

This is where many artists recover something more useful than confidence: curiosity. Confidence often wants a guarantee. Curiosity can tolerate uncertainty. It asks what happens next, even when the answer is not flattering.

Rebuild your standards

Creative burnout can come from standards that are either too low or impossibly high. Low standards leave the work feeling empty because nothing is at stake. Impossible standards turn every attempt into an encounter with imagined greatness.

The culture of constant comparison intensifies this problem. You see finished work, polished images, tour announcements, awards, and carefully edited declarations of purpose. You do not see the abandoned drafts, the financial strain, the ugly first versions, or the long stretches in which another artist felt fraudulent.

Your standards need to be demanding enough to give the work shape and humane enough to permit growth. Keep a few artists near you whose work you genuinely respect. Study what they do with rhythm, image, structure, restraint, or intensity. Then return to your own limits. Influence becomes harmful when it tells you to become a copy of someone else’s finished self.

A creative voice is not a fixed possession that burnout can steal in one bad year. It is a relationship built through repeated attention. It changes as your life changes. Sometimes the voice you miss is the voice of a person you no longer are.

Let recovery remain uneven

There may be a day when you work well again and feel relieved. Then the next day may feel barren. Do not turn that fluctuation into a drama. Recovery does not move in a straight line, and a serious practice does not depend on permanent intensity.

Give yourself enough time to become receptive again. Read slowly. Listen without multitasking. Walk without treating the walk as a productivity tool. Speak to people who make you feel less like a brand and more like a person. These acts may look indirect, yet they restore the attention from which worthwhile work comes.

The aim is not to return to the old machine with better fuel. It is to build a practice that can survive your humanity. When you sit down to make something again, let the first honest gesture be small. Let it be unfinished. Let it belong to you before it belongs to anyone else.

Authenticity vs Social Approval and the Cost of Fitting In

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Authenticity vs social approval is a conflict between speaking from your own judgment and shaping yourself for acceptance. The answer is not to reject other people. It is to stop letting their immediate reaction decide what you are allowed to value, say, or become.

Most people learn this conflict early. A child tells a strange joke, wears something unfashionable, loves an unpopular song, asks a question that interrupts the room. The correction often arrives before any serious thought: laughter, silence, a raised eyebrow, exclusion. Soon enough, the person learns to scan the room before speaking.

That habit can follow us into adulthood. It appears in the artist who softens the work until it sounds like everything else. It appears in the student who repeats opinions they have not examined. It appears in the friend who never says what they need because being easy to keep around feels safer than being known.

Understand the real conflict

Social approval is not inherently corrupt. Human beings need recognition. We need friendship, collaboration, criticism, and the feeling that our presence matters to others. A person who claims total indifference to every audience may be performing a different kind of pose.

The problem begins when approval becomes the highest court of appeal. At that point, the question changes. Instead of asking, "Is this true to my experience?" or "Is this work any good?" a person asks, "Will this make people stay comfortable with me?"

That is a poor basis for a life. Comfort is a weak judge of art, character, and thought. Many worthwhile acts initially create discomfort because they reveal a difference that the group would prefer to smooth over.

Authenticity does not mean blurting out every feeling, treating impulse as wisdom, or making a spectacle of defiance. A person can be loud and still be deeply dependent on applause. Another can be quiet and possess a firm inner life. Authenticity requires examination. It asks whether your choices come from considered values or from fear wearing the mask of good manners.

See how approval shapes taste

Taste often gets mistaken for a private matter. It is not. Taste develops among other people, through repetition, prestige, fashion, ridicule, and the subtle pressure to appear informed. Few people want to admit how often they have pretended to enjoy something because the right crowd already approved it.

Music makes this plain. An artist may begin with a rough, personal sound, then notice which songs receive the strongest response. There is nothing wrong with learning from an audience. The danger comes when the audience becomes a formula. The artist starts writing toward recognition rather than toward the difficult thing they actually hear.

The same happens with ideas. A phrase travels through a group because it signals membership. People repeat it with confidence. Yet ask them to define it, test it, or name its cost, and the confidence thins out. Social approval rewards quick agreement because agreement is easy to recognize. Independent thought takes longer. It may sound uncertain while it is still becoming precise.

Nietzsche had little patience for borrowed values. His point was not that every individual should invent a private morality from scratch. His sharper insight was that inherited judgments can make people small when they accept them without testing their force. The crowd offers relief from the burden of deciding. It also charges a price for that relief.

Distinguish belonging from conformity

Belonging says, "You can be here as yourself." Conformity says, "You can be here if you become easier for us to categorize." The two can look similar from the outside. Both include shared language, rituals, references, and expectations. The difference appears when disagreement arrives.

A healthy friendship can survive a change in taste, a hard truth, or a period of growth. It does not demand that you remain frozen in the version of yourself that first earned affection. A brittle social circle treats growth as betrayal. It rewards predictability because predictability protects the group from having to reconsider itself.

This matters for young people especially, though age offers no immunity. The hunger to belong can make a person accept a script before they have written a sentence of their own. They choose a personality that gets rewarded. Later, they call the resulting emptiness a mystery.

It is not a mystery. It is the feeling of living too long at a distance from your own perceptions.

Practice honesty with discipline

The answer is not to make authenticity into a performance. Many people announce their refusal to care what anyone thinks while watching closely to see who admires the announcement. Defiance can become another route to social approval, especially when rebellion itself has become fashionable.

A more serious practice is quieter. Start by noticing where you edit yourself automatically. Perhaps you laugh at things that do not amuse you. Perhaps you hide work until it resembles familiar work. Perhaps you agree too quickly because disagreement feels like a threat to your place in the room.

Then slow down. You do not need a grand declaration every time you differ. You may simply say, "I do not see it that way," and allow the silence to exist. You may admit that a popular work leaves you cold. You may take time before joining an opinion that arrived fully packaged.

Honesty also requires standards. Saying what you think does not excuse carelessness. If your view affects someone else, state it accurately. Listen long enough to understand what you are resisting. Revise when evidence defeats your first position. Authenticity without humility hardens into vanity.

Accept the cost of having a voice

There is a cost to becoming more legible to yourself. Some people liked the version of you that never created friction. Some opportunities depend on saying the expected thing at the expected time. Some rooms offer warmth only in exchange for agreement.

This does not mean every loss proves you were right. A person can lose approval through arrogance, cruelty, or poor judgment. Reflection must remain part of the process. Ask what you said, why you said it, and whether you were trying to tell the truth or simply trying to win.

Still, a life built around avoiding every disapproving glance becomes narrow. You begin to organize your days around the emotional weather of other people. Your work loses its edge. Your friendships become arrangements. Even praise feels thin because it is praise for a version of you designed to receive it.

The better aim is earned respect, not universal approval. Earned respect can include disagreement. It may arrive slowly, if it arrives at all. But it rests on something more solid than popularity: people can sense when a person has done the difficult work of forming a judgment.

Keep a private standard

A private standard does not mean isolation. It means having a place within yourself where public reaction cannot immediately erase your view. Artists need this place. So do writers, teachers, friends, and anyone trying to live with a measure of coherence.

Build it through attention. Read beyond the approved list. Spend time with art that does not flatter your existing preferences. Write down what moves you and why. Notice which opinions feel borrowed in your mouth. The goal is not to become strange for its own sake. The goal is to become harder to manipulate.

Social approval will always exert pressure because no one lives outside human relations. The question is whether that pressure helps you refine your character or persuades you to abandon it. Keep people close who can challenge you without demanding your disappearance. Let your work receive criticism without allowing every reaction to become a command.

A real voice is rarely born in perfect confidence. It grows when a person learns to tolerate being misunderstood for a while, listens carefully, and continues speaking from a judgment they have honestly made.