Finding Artistic Purpose Without a False Persona

 Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Finding artistic purpose means identifying the pressure, question, or experience you cannot leave alone, then giving it form through disciplined work. It does not mean locating a flattering identity, a marketable niche, or a grand explanation for every piece you make.

Many artists lose years trying to feel certain before they begin. They wait for a clean statement of intent: I make music about this, I paint for that reason, I write for these people. The wish is understandable. A purpose seems like protection against embarrassment and wasted effort. Yet art rarely starts with a complete philosophy. More often, it starts with irritation, fascination, grief, hunger, a sound that will not leave the mind, or a scene from ordinary life that seems to contain more than it first reveals.

Purpose is not a slogan pasted onto creative work after the fact. It emerges through attention. You learn what you are here to make by seeing what keeps returning in your work, even when you try to move on.

Stop borrowing a purpose

A borrowed purpose feels impressive at first. It gives the artist a ready-made vocabulary and a place in a recognizable crowd. Someone decides they are a serious songwriter because they use the accepted references. Someone else writes dense, gloomy prose because seriousness has become a costume. The work may be competent. It may even receive praise. But it has no inner pressure.

This happens because culture supplies many visible models of the artist. There is the confessional artist, the provocateur, the refined minimalist, the wounded genius, the restless experimenter. Each model carries a set of poses, images, and expectations. None is automatically false. Trouble begins when a person adopts one because it looks like permission to matter.

Ask a less flattering question: if nobody could identify you from this work, would you still want to make it? If the answer is no, you may be serving an image of the artist rather than the work itself.

This does not require total purity. Every artist learns through imitation. A young guitarist borrows a tone. A writer takes on the sentence rhythm of a favorite novelist. That is part of education. The point is to keep moving. Imitation should train the ear, not become a permanent residence.

Find the recurring question

Your artistic purpose often hides inside a question you keep asking without resolving. It may concern loneliness, status, beauty, memory, shame, friendship, violence, desire, or the strange rituals people use to convince themselves they belong. The question may be personal, yet it becomes artistic when you can see its shape in other lives.

Do not rush to convert that question into a message. Art is weaker when it behaves like a lecture with attractive lighting. A serious work lets the question remain alive. It gives the audience a form of experience rather than an order to agree.

Nietzsche wrote with force about becoming who one is, a phrase often reduced to self-branding. Its harder meaning is closer to this: a person must face the materials already present in their character, including contradiction, resentment, desire, and failure. The artist does not invent a self from thin air. The artist gives an honest arrangement to what has been there, half-seen, all along.

Keep a record of what catches you. Not a polished journal for an imagined reader. A private ledger will do. Write down overheard phrases, images from bad dreams, gestures that reveal insecurity, songs that make you uneasy, moments when a room changes because one person enters it. After several months, review the pages. Patterns will appear. Those patterns are evidence.

Build a practice that can tell the truth

Inspiration has a public relations problem. People speak of it as if it arrives fully formed and rewards the naturally gifted. In reality, inspiration often appears after work has already begun. The blank page offers little. The third page may offer a sentence with some heat. The tenth attempt at a melody may reveal the one that carries the feeling.

A practice gives purpose a place to become visible. Set a schedule that is strict enough to create momentum and flexible enough to survive an actual life. A musician with an exhausting day job may have four focused sessions a week. A student may work in short daily intervals. The correct structure depends on your responsibilities, energy, and medium. What matters is repetition.

During those sessions, separate making from judging. Make the rough draft, the ugly sketch, the unsteady recording. Then return later with judgment. When creation and judgment happen at the same second, the inner critic gains too much power. It starts mistaking caution for taste.

Taste still matters. It is the faculty that tells you when something rings false, when a phrase is lazy, when a familiar chord progression has been used as emotional shorthand. But taste develops through exposure and revision, not through contempt for your own early work. Make enough work to have something worth rejecting.

Let limits shape the work

Purpose becomes clearer when you accept limits. The limit may be money, time, equipment, technical skill, or a narrow frame you choose on purpose. A cheap recorder can produce an intimate sound that an expensive studio might smooth away. A poem limited to one page may force the writer to cut false grandeur. A small stage may teach a performer how to hold silence.

There is a trade-off. Limits can sharpen imagination, but they can also become excuses. Some artists romanticize deprivation because it lets them avoid learning the craft they claim to value. Others spend endlessly on tools because buying equipment feels safer than finishing anything. Neither posture serves the work.

Use what you have. Learn what you need. Finish within the conditions of your life.

Accept that purpose changes

The purpose you find at twenty may not survive intact at thirty-five. That is not proof that the earlier work was fraudulent. It may have been true for the person who made it. People change after loss, study, failure, intimacy, boredom, and labor. Their artistic concerns change with them.

The danger lies in treating an old identity as a contract. An artist becomes known for one mood or subject and starts repeating it because repetition appears safer than growth. Audiences can encourage this. They often want the work that first gave them a feeling. Yet an artist who only reproduces past approval turns a living practice into a museum display.

Change with care. Do not abandon an older form simply because it no longer attracts attention. Ask whether you have reached its limit or merely grown impatient. Difficult work often looks stale before it reveals a new direction. Stay long enough to know the difference.

Give the work a reader or listener

Artistic purpose is personal, but it is not private in the narrow sense. A song, essay, film, or performance becomes complete when it meets another person’s attention. You do not need to predict every reaction. You do need to consider whether the work offers someone more than your unprocessed feelings.

The difference is form. Raw confession says, here is my pain. Form asks, what does this pain reveal about fear, attachment, pride, or the ways people fail one another? The artist does not erase the personal material. They shape it until another person can enter it.

That requires respect for the audience. Do not flatter them with easy sentiment. Do not punish them with obscurity used as proof of intelligence. Give them a reason to stay with the work. Give them detail, tension, rhythm, and a mind at work.

Finding artistic purpose is less like receiving an answer than building a relationship with what you cannot ignore. Pay attention to the subjects that return. Work on them long enough to move beyond pose. Let your standards grow beside your courage. Then make the next piece, even before you can fully explain why it has to exist.

12 Self Deception Examples We Tell Ourselves

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Self deception examples are the small, persuasive stories we use to avoid a fact about our conduct, our desires, or our direction. They let a person feel coherent for another day, even when some part of life has begun to ask for an honest reckoning.

Most self-deception does not look dramatic. It looks like a postponed phone call, a joke made at someone else's expense, a career plan repeated long after it has lost meaning. The mind is skilled at protecting its familiar image of itself. That protection can feel like peace. Often, it is only delay.

Why self-deception feels believable

A lie told to another person has an audience. Self-deception has an inner stage, and we write the script, perform it, and applaud at the end. This makes it hard to catch. We do not usually say, "I want to avoid reality." We say, "I am being practical," "I am waiting for the right time," or "This is just who I am."

The point is not to turn every human inconsistency into a moral crime. People need privacy, recovery, uncertainty, and room to change their minds. A person can take time before making a hard decision without lying to themselves. The difference lies in the direction of the thought. Honest uncertainty stays open to evidence. Self-deception keeps arranging evidence until it delivers a preferred verdict.

It survives because it offers immediate comfort. The cost arrives later, usually as resentment, repetition, or a vague sense that one has become a spectator in one's own life.

Self deception examples in ordinary life

1. "I work best under pressure."

Sometimes a deadline does produce focus. But this sentence can become a polished excuse for chronic avoidance. The person who waits until panic takes over may confuse adrenaline with discipline.

The work gets done, perhaps. Yet the pattern steals revision, rest, and the quieter forms of thought that serious work requires. A musician who only rehearses before a performance may call it spontaneity. More often, they fear hearing what needs improvement.

2. "I am just being honest."

Honesty is often used as cover for cruelty. There is a difference between saying something difficult because it may help and saying it because one enjoys the force of it.

Ask what follows the statement. Does it offer clarity, or does it leave another person diminished while the speaker feels superior? A blunt person may take pride in having no filter when the real issue is that they have never learned restraint.

3. "I do not care what people think."

Few people are free from the opinions of others. The claim often appears when someone cares intensely and has decided that admitting it would feel weak. They may dress their wound in contempt.

There is dignity in refusing to live by applause. There is no dignity in pretending rejection did not hurt. The first position gives a person freedom. The second leaves them ruled by the judgment they deny.

4. "I could quit anytime."

This phrase appears around habits that have started to take more than they give. It may concern alcohol, endless scrolling, gambling, casual hookups, shopping, or any routine that offers relief and then asks for more.

The test is plain: stop for a meaningful period, without bargaining. If the idea creates anger, panic, or elaborate exceptions, the person has learned something. Freedom does not need to announce itself. It can act.

5. "I am too busy."

Some people are genuinely overloaded. Work, caregiving, money, and exhaustion impose real limits. Still, busyness can become a respectable mask for avoidance.

A person may say they have no time to write, practice, repair a friendship, or attend to their health. Then they spend hours in distraction because distraction asks nothing difficult of them. The issue is not that every spare minute must become productive. The issue is whether "busy" has become a way to avoid naming what one has chosen not to face.

6. "This relationship is fine."

A relationship does not need constant drama to be damaged. Sometimes the warning sign is the absence of aliveness: no curiosity, no direct speech, no feeling that either person is truly seen.

People remain because leaving would disrupt an identity, a routine, or a future they have pictured for years. They call the arrangement stable. It may be stable in the same way a locked room is stable. Security and stagnation can resemble each other from a distance.

7. "I am waiting for the right moment."

The right moment exists for some decisions. Timing matters when money is short, skills are undeveloped, or others depend on you. Yet the imagined perfect moment often serves as a hiding place for fear.

A creative person may wait to release work until it feels beyond criticism. That day does not come. Art enters the world unfinished in some sense, because the artist changes while making it. The demand for certainty can become a method of never being judged.

8. "That is just my personality."

Personality language can explain a pattern without excusing it. "I am private" may mean, "I refuse to risk being known." "I am passionate" may mean, "I make other people carry my anger." "I am independent" may mean, "I do not know how to receive care."

We need words for temperament. They help us understand our limits and styles. But a description becomes self-deception when it turns into a permanent alibi. Character has shape, but it is not a prison sentence.

9. "Everyone else is the problem."

A person can be surrounded by difficult people. This happens. But when every former friend, collaborator, teacher, or partner becomes a villain in the same story, the pattern deserves inspection.

The question is not whether others failed you. Many may have. The question is whether you can identify your own recurring role. Perhaps you withdraw, provoke, demand too much, or choose familiar chaos because calm feels empty. A mature account of pain includes the parts we would rather edit out.

10. "I deserve this because I have suffered."

Suffering can create a private sense of entitlement. Someone who feels overlooked may permit themselves dishonesty. Someone who has been hurt may treat kindness as something they can collect without returning.

Pain deserves compassion. It does not grant permission to become careless with other people. If anything, pain should teach us how quickly a person can be reduced by indifference.

11. "I am doing this for them."

Parents, partners, managers, and friends sometimes control others under the banner of care. The language sounds noble because care is real. Control may be real too.

Helping another person does not mean deciding their inner life for them. When "for your own good" appears too often, ask whose anxiety is being managed. The answer may be uncomfortable.

12. "I will deal with it later."

Later is one of the mind's favorite countries. It contains the apology, the medical appointment, the difficult conversation, the unfinished project, and the account balance we do not want to inspect.

Delay can be wise when it creates space for thought. Delay becomes deception when each day produces a new reason to keep the same matter untouched. A problem ignored does not remain still. It develops its own momentum.

Catch the story before it hardens

The most useful question is simple: what do I gain by believing this? Do not ask it with theatrical self-hatred. Ask it as a writer studies a sentence that has become too convenient. What does the sentence protect? What action would become necessary if it were no longer true?

Then look for concrete evidence. If you say you value your art, examine where your hours go. If you say a friendship matters, examine whether you reach out. If you claim independence, examine whether you can tolerate asking for help. Reality is often less flattering than our self-description. It is also more usable.

Self-knowledge does not require constant self-surveillance. It asks for a willingness to revise the story when life contradicts it. That willingness can feel like a loss at first. Then it becomes a form of relief: you no longer have to spend so much energy defending a version of yourself that cannot live.

Nietzsche Versus Nihilism and the Work of Meaning

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Nietzsche versus nihilism is not a simple battle between a philosopher of despair and a philosophy of despair. Nietzsche diagnosed nihilism with unusual force, but he spent his life looking for a way through it: the creation of values strong enough to be lived.

That distinction matters because nihilism has become a mood word. People use it to mean boredom, cynicism, dark humor, or the feeling that nothing has any point. Nietzsche meant something more severe. He saw a culture losing faith in the values that had organized its judgments, habits, and sense of human rank. The old answers no longer persuaded. Yet no new measure had earned real authority.

For a musician, writer, student, or anyone trying to make a life with some shape to it, this is not antique philosophy. It is the familiar pressure of having too many choices and too few standards. You can sample every style, borrow every opinion, perform every identity, then still wonder what deserves your loyalty.

See what Nietzsche meant by nihilism

Nihilism begins when the highest values lose their force. A person may continue to repeat them, praise them, or teach them, but inwardly they no longer command belief. The result is not immediate chaos. More often, it is exhaustion. People continue moving through routines while suspecting that the words around them have gone hollow.

Nietzsche saw this as a historical and psychological condition. He did not say that life literally had no value. He argued that inherited systems for assigning value had become unconvincing. That is a different claim, and a harder one to answer.

The shallow version of nihilism says, "Nothing matters, so why try?" It can feel sharp because it refuses cheap comfort. But it also gives up too quickly. It mistakes the collapse of borrowed meaning for proof that meaning itself is impossible.

This is why Nietzsche remains uncomfortable. He refuses the easy rescue. He does not offer a clean replacement system that can be memorized and repeated. He asks what kind of person can endure uncertainty without turning either numb or cruel.

Separate diagnosis from endorsement

Many readers meet Nietzsche through fragments: a hard sentence quoted online, an image of rebellion, a reputation for contempt. From that distance, he can look like nihilism's great spokesman. The record says otherwise.

Nietzsche feared a passive form of nihilism. Passive nihilism drains desire and lowers ambition. It seeks relief from disappointment by claiming that ambition itself is foolish. It prefers safety, conformity, and small pleasures that ask nothing difficult of the self. It is not always dramatic. Often it wears the face of irony.

The person trapped there may mock every serious effort before that effort can make demands. They call ideals fake because they have seen hypocrisy. They call discipline repression because discipline exposes their own inconsistency. They call taste arbitrary because developing taste takes patience.

Nietzsche understood the temptation. He did not merely scold it. A person who has watched institutions, authorities, or admired figures fail can become suspicious of every claim to greatness. Suspicion has its uses. It clears fraud from the room. But suspicion cannot compose a song, sustain a friendship, train a body, or form a character by itself.

His alternative was not optimism. Optimism can be another way of refusing to look at pain. Nietzsche wanted an affirmative stance toward life, including its loss, conflict, limitation, and uncertainty. He wanted a person who could say yes without pretending that existence is neat.

Understand active nihilism

Nietzsche sometimes described active nihilism as a destructive force. This phrase needs care. He did not mean wrecking things for the pleasure of wreckage. Active nihilism names the moment when old values have lost their credibility and someone has the strength to clear them away rather than preserve them out of fear.

That clearing can be dangerous. A person who rejects every inherited standard may become addicted to negation. They can confuse breaking with creating. The loud refusal becomes a personality, and soon it needs an enemy to stay alive.

Still, Nietzsche thought destruction could have a role. Bad values do not become good simply because they are familiar. If a standard trains people toward resentment, dishonesty, or self-contempt, keeping it intact is not wisdom. The question is what follows after the break.

Here Nietzsche parts company with the nihilist posture. Nihilism stops at the verdict that old meaning has failed. Nietzsche asks for a harder labor: making new values through conduct, judgment, work, and style. This is not a weekend exercise in self-branding. It demands repeated choices, and those choices carry consequences.

Create values without making them arbitrary

The phrase "create your own values" is often reduced to personal preference. If I like it, it is my truth. Nietzsche's thought is far less casual.

A value earns weight when it organizes a life. It appears in what a person refuses, practices, protects, and produces. It survives contact with difficulty. Someone who says they value artistic freedom but cannot tolerate revision has not yet made freedom into a value. Someone who praises honesty but speaks only when it costs nothing has chosen comfort over honesty.

Creation, in this sense, is closer to composition than consumption. A musician does not create a piece by collecting every available sound. They select, cut, repeat, alter, and leave things out. Form arrives through limits. So does a life.

Nietzsche's idea of the will to power belongs here. It does not simply mean domination over other people. At its most fruitful, it concerns the drive to shape, interpret, overcome resistance, and give form to one's energies. The immature version seeks control because it fears vulnerability. The stronger version disciplines itself enough to make something real.

That is why taste matters. Taste is not snobbery when it grows from attention and responsibility. It is the ability to discriminate: this is alive, this is deadening; this is honest, this is imitation; this challenge will deepen me, this one will merely scatter me. A culture that refuses all judgment may call itself open-minded, yet it leaves people defenseless before whatever is loudest.

Read the overman carefully

Nietzsche's overman, or Übermensch, is often treated as a fantasy of superiority. That reading misses the inward demand of the idea. The overman is not a license to look down on others. It is an image of self-overcoming.

Self-overcoming means refusing to make your present limits into permanent identity. It means seeing envy, fear, laziness, and resentment without decorating them as principles. It means learning from pain without building a shrine to pain.

Nobody completes this project. Nietzsche did not offer a graduation ceremony for becoming fully formed. The point is direction. Are you arranging your life around excuses, or are you turning your materials into a more deliberate form?

This question can become harsh if handled without care. People face real constraints, loss, illness, money pressure, and wounds that do not yield to slogans. Nietzsche's demand should not become a weapon against people who are struggling. Yet difficulty does not erase agency altogether. Even under pressure, a person can ask what response remains possible: a better habit, a clearer refusal, an hour of work, a less dishonest story.

Use Nietzsche versus nihilism in daily life

The practical force of Nietzsche versus nihilism appears when cynicism starts masquerading as intelligence. You may feel it while scrolling through a culture that turns every sincere statement into a joke. You may feel it after hearing empty language from people who claim to know what matters. You may feel it when your own ambitions begin to look embarrassing.

Nietzsche's answer is not to become naive. Keep your critical mind. Notice the frauds. Reject standards that make you smaller. Then make a demand of yourself that cynicism cannot satisfy.

Choose a practice that has resistance in it. Learn an instrument beyond the point where it flatters you. Read work that does not agree with your first reaction. Build a standard for your speech. Keep promises that nobody can reward. Let your taste develop slowly enough that it becomes yours rather than a collection of borrowed signals.

Meaning does not arrive as a slogan printed over a blank wall. It gathers around commitments tested over time. Nietzsche saw nihilism clearly because he knew how easily people drift when inherited answers fail. His challenge remains severe and useful: do not worship the emptiness you have discovered. Put something demanding, honest, and living in its place.

Art Versus Entertainment and What Culture Demands

 Dess Dermondy rock music

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Art versus entertainment is a false opposition when it suggests that one must be serious and the other shallow. The real difference lies in what a work asks from us, how long it stays with us, and whether it changes the way we see.

A song can make a crowded room move and still carry the weight of a private confession. A film can be funny, fast, and visually seductive while leaving us unsettled for days. On the other hand, a work can call itself art and offer little beyond status, obscurity, or the familiar performance of seriousness. The label does not settle the matter.

The question is not whether pleasure belongs in culture. Of course it does. Human beings need laughter, rhythm, spectacle, suspense, and rest. The sharper question is whether pleasure is the final destination, or whether it opens a door to something harder to name.

Stop treating art versus entertainment as a war

People often speak as if art lives above entertainment, untouched by commerce, popularity, and ordinary desire. This is a comforting picture for people who want culture to prove their superior taste. It is also historically thin.

Many works now treated as high art were made for public audiences. Plays were loud, social events. Popular songs carried grief, lust, class anxiety, and local memory through melodies people could actually remember. Great novels have always depended on momentum. They make readers turn the page.

Entertainment, at its best, gives form to shared feeling. It gathers strangers around a beat, a story, a joke, a game, or a face on a screen. There is no shame in that. A culture that cannot entertain becomes stiff and self-congratulatory. It mistakes boredom for intelligence.

Yet art asks for a second encounter. It does not exhaust itself when the show ends. Something in it resists immediate consumption. A line returns while you are washing dishes. A melody changes its meaning after a loss. A photograph makes you aware of how casually you have been looking at other people.

That afterlife matters. Entertainment can have one too, but it does not always seek it. Much entertainment is designed to fill time cleanly, then make room for the next thing. Art may fill time, but it also interrupts it.

Ask what the work does to attention

The difference becomes clearer when we look at attention. Entertainment usually works by guiding attention smoothly. It knows how to hold us. It supplies pace, payoff, familiarity, and emotional cues. None of this is cheap by definition. Craft is real, and a well-made popular work deserves more respect than many critics allow.

Art may use the same tools, then turn them against our habits. It can slow us down where we expect speed. It can deny the easy resolution. It can make a beautiful sound feel dangerous because of what it contains. It can place silence where a punchline or chorus should be.

This does not mean difficulty automatically produces value. Confusion is not depth. A work that withholds meaning may simply have no meaning to give. The audience does not owe endless patience to every artist who refuses clarity.

Still, some works deserve time because they confront experience that cannot be reduced to a clean message. Grief is not clean. Desire is not clean. Identity is not clean. The artist who makes room for contradiction may frustrate us at first, then offer a truer account of being alive than a work built around instant recognition.

Pleasure is not a lesser goal

A serious culture should distrust the old pose that treats enjoyment as intellectual failure. Joy can be exacting. Dancing requires a body to listen. Comedy can expose vanity with more force than a lecture. A pop chorus can carry a feeling across years because it gives that feeling a shape people can sing together.

The issue is not whether a work feels good. The issue is whether it leaves us more awake. Some pleasures sharpen perception. Others dull it. There is a difference between a song that helps you feel your loneliness and a stream of content that makes you forget you are lonely for forty minutes.

This is why taste cannot be reduced to genre, budget, or prestige. An independent record can be empty posturing. A studio comedy can be generous, precise, and wise. A gallery installation can be alive with thought. It can also be a thin idea protected by difficult language.

Taste begins when we stop borrowing our judgment from the crowd, the market, or the institutions that tell us what serious people are supposed to admire.

Friction has a purpose

Good art often creates friction, but friction should serve an encounter. A harsh vocal performance, an unresolved ending, or an ugly image can force the audience beyond passive approval. It can ask us to sit with what we would rather edit out of our self-image.

That is different from punishment. Some artists confuse hostility with honesty. They seem to believe that if the audience feels excluded, the work has gained depth. This is a dead end. Art can challenge without sneering at the people who came willing to listen.

The strongest work creates a difficult intimacy. It says: stay here. Look again. You may not enjoy every second of this, but there is something here you cannot meet through distraction alone.

Notice who benefits from constant consumption

The argument around art versus entertainment becomes more serious when we consider the pressure placed on attention. Much contemporary culture trains us to expect immediate reward. If a song does not announce itself quickly, we skip it. If a film pauses, we reach for another screen. If a thought does not arrive as a slogan, we treat it as a failure.

This habit changes the audience before it changes the artist. We become less able to tolerate ambiguity, silence, and gradual discovery. We demand that every work prove its value at once. Then artists, understandably, shape their work around that demand.

There is a cost. We lose the patience needed for an album that unfolds slowly, a novel with no simple hero, or a piece of music whose meaning appears only after repeated listening. We also lose contact with parts of ourselves that do not speak in quick answers.

No one needs to live in permanent solemnity. There is nothing noble about turning every evening into a seminar. But a person who consumes only what arrives easily may begin to mistake ease for truth. That is a narrow life, even when it feels full.

Make room for both

The answer is not to reject entertainment and retreat into a private museum of approved masterpieces. Such a life can become bloodless. Watch the absurd movie. Play the loud song. Enjoy the hook, the chase scene, the joke that makes no claim to permanence. Pleasure is part of being human, and art that forgets this often loses its pulse.

But keep another part of your life available for work that asks more of you. Return to the record you did not understand the first time. Read slowly enough to notice where a writer makes you uncomfortable. Go to performances where the room is not merely entertained but changed, even slightly, by what it has witnessed.

The test is personal, though not private. Ask what you carry away. Ask whether a work gave you only stimulation or whether it gave language to something you had felt without being able to say. Ask whether it made you more alert to other people, more honest about yourself, or more capable of sitting with an unanswered question.

Art and entertainment meet whenever a work gives pleasure without treating the audience as a machine for clicks, applause, or distraction. Look for work that respects your attention. Give it enough attention to answer back.