Why Does Success Feel Empty After You Get It?

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

Why does success feel empty? Because achievement can satisfy the part of you that wanted proof, while leaving the part that wanted a life untouched. You reach the mark, hear the approval, see the evidence, and still face the same private consciousness when the noise stops.

This experience does not mean you are spoiled, ungrateful, or incapable of joy. It often means you asked success to do work that success cannot do. A promotion can change your schedule. An audience can change your visibility. Money can remove certain pressures. None of these, by themselves, tells you what deserves your devotion once the race is over.

There is a peculiar silence after a long ambition is fulfilled. Many people expect a permanent change in feeling, as if the achievement will settle an argument with themselves. Instead, the mind adjusts quickly. What once looked like a mountain becomes part of the scenery.

Why success feels empty after the goal

Success often begins as a promise. It says: when you get there, you will finally be respected; you will no longer feel behind; you will become someone real. The trouble is that these promises are usually vague. They borrow their force from old wounds, comparison, family expectations, or the general pressure to look like a person whose life is moving upward.

A goal can be useful even when it comes from mixed motives. The danger appears when you confuse movement with meaning. You may work for years with discipline and real talent, then discover that the destination was designed to impress people you do not even admire.

This is common in creative life. A musician may chase streams, a larger room, favorable reviews, or access to a certain scene. Those things can matter. They can create time, reach, and opportunity. Yet an artist who has lost contact with the original pleasure of making sound may experience every new milestone as another demand to maintain an image.

The achievement is real. So is the emptiness.

Separate the goal from the need beneath it

Most ambitions carry a hidden question. “Will this prove I matter?” “Will this make people stay?” “Will I stop feeling ordinary?” “Will I finally be allowed to take myself seriously?” No award, income figure, body of work, or public compliment can answer these questions for long, because they are not questions about performance. They are questions about identity.

Success feels thin when it serves as a substitute for self-knowledge. You may know exactly how to win within a field while having little idea what kind of day feels honest, what friendships nourish you, what work you can respect, or what forms of attention leave you depleted.

This is where a person can look impressive and feel estranged. They have become highly legible to others, yet less legible to themselves. Their calendar is full. Their inner language has gone quiet.

Nietzsche understood that a person can inherit values without examining them. Much of what passes for ambition comes preloaded with assumptions: more recognition is better than less, busyness proves worth, expansion signals health, and being desired by strangers outweighs being known by a few people. These assumptions do not become true because they are widely repeated.

Ask a harder question than “How do I get ahead?” Ask, “Ahead of whom, and toward what?” The answer may unsettle you. That is useful.

Notice when success becomes a performance

There is nothing shameful about wanting recognition. Artists need listeners. Writers need readers. Good work deserves a public life. But recognition becomes corrosive when it turns every experience into material for display.

A person begins to watch themselves living. They choose the impressive version of an evening over the restorative one. They keep producing after curiosity has faded because stopping feels like failure. They say yes to work that enlarges their profile and quietly shrinks their spirit.

This is one reason success can feel lonely. Public attention creates a version of you that other people consume, praise, criticize, and expect. That version may be accurate in part. It is never the whole person. If you spend too much time serving it, you can lose access to the ordinary self that has no audience and no market value.

The culture around achievement rarely helps. It treats every pause as a missed opportunity and every private uncertainty as a branding problem. It turns a human life into a chart of visible outputs. Under those conditions, satisfaction becomes difficult because you are trained to convert satisfaction into the next target.

There is always a next target. That is the business model of comparison.

Let the feeling give you information

Do not rush to erase emptiness with another goal. Many people do exactly that. They respond to a hollow victory by raising the stakes: more money, a better title, a larger audience, a harder credential. For a while, the renewed chase supplies energy. Then the old silence returns, often with more force.

Instead, treat the feeling as information. It may be telling you that your life lacks intimacy, rest, play, craft, physical presence, or time away from judgment. It may be telling you that you have succeeded in an environment whose values you no longer share. It may be telling you that you need to grieve the fantasy that achievement would repair the past.

That grief has dignity. You are letting go of a bargain that was never fully possible.

The next move is not always dramatic. You may not need to quit your job, abandon your field, or reject every ambition. Sometimes the correction is smaller and more exact. Make work that will not be posted. Spend time with someone who does not need your résumé. Protect an hour in which you are not improving, measuring, or explaining yourself. Return to the art, place, or practice that mattered before it became useful.

These actions can sound modest beside the mythology of success. They are not small in their effect. They restore contact with a self that exists before applause.

Build a life that can hold achievement

Achievement feels better when it enters a life with structure beyond achievement. Friendship matters here, but not friendship organized around mutual networking. You need people who can tell when you are performing, people who can speak to you without treating your output as your identity.

You also need standards that are your own. Taste is one of them. To develop taste is to learn what you can live with, what you reject, what kind of work moves you, and what cheapens your attention. This does not make life easier. It makes your choices less borrowed.

A personal standard will sometimes cost you speed. It may mean taking fewer opportunities, making less visible work, earning less for a period, or disappointing people who preferred the old version of you. Those are real trade-offs. Meaning is not a decorative layer placed on top of a successful life. It asks for decisions, and decisions close doors.

Still, a life built only around open doors becomes exhausting. You need some doors closed so you can hear yourself think.

Success can be enjoyable. It can bring relief, pleasure, pride, and a wider field of action. Do not make emptiness into another identity either. The point is not to distrust every accomplishment or pretend that wanting more is a moral failure. The point is to stop asking achievement to provide a complete answer to the question of how to live.

Let success be evidence that you did something difficult. Let it pay for time, make room for better work, or widen your ability to contribute. Then return to the quieter work: choosing values you can defend, making room for people who know you, and building days that would still feel inhabited if no one clapped.

Keith Moon was right on

 I thought he was so wrong. It turns out he was right on

A Guide to Writing Reflective Essays Well

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

A guide to writing reflective essays begins with a simple discipline: do not report what happened and stop there. Choose one lived moment, examine the belief or feeling it disturbed, and show how your thinking changed.

A reflective essay is personal, yet it is not private writing pasted onto a page. The reader needs more than access to your memory. They need to see a mind at work: noticing, questioning, resisting easy answers, and reaching a more considered view.

For people drawn to art, philosophy, music, and self-education, this form can feel natural. A song you dismissed, a conversation that unsettled you, a failure that exposed your habits, or a quiet moment of envy can all become material. The event is the doorway. Reflection is what makes the piece worth entering.

Know what reflection does

Reflection asks, “What did this mean?” It does not merely ask, “What happened next?” A narrative gives sequence. A reflective essay gives interpretation.

Suppose you write about performing badly at an open mic. A weak draft might explain the venue, the set list, the missed notes, and the embarrassment afterward. Those facts create a scene, but they do not yet create an essay. The stronger question is why the failure hurt so much. Perhaps you had confused being admired with becoming competent. Perhaps you expected an audience to repair a doubt you had refused to face alone.

That movement from incident to meaning gives the essay its center. You are tracing the gap between your earlier understanding and your present one. Sometimes the gap is wide. Sometimes it is small, almost embarrassing in its ordinariness. Both can work.

Do not force a grand lesson onto a minor experience. A reflective essay gains force from accuracy, not inflated drama. Missing a train may reveal little. Missing it because you were avoiding a difficult conversation may reveal something about delay, fear, and the stories people tell themselves to remain comfortable.

Choose one moment

Writers often choose a subject that is too large: grief, identity, friendship, creativity, childhood, success. These are territories, not essays. Start with a specific moment inside the larger subject.

Write about the afternoon you deleted an unfinished track. Write about the sentence in a book that made you angry. Write about sitting in a room where everyone seemed fluent in a social code you did not possess. A concrete scene gives your reader something to hold while the thought grows more abstract.

Choose a moment that still has friction. If you understand it completely and feel nothing when you revisit it, the piece may become an exercise in explanation. Productive material often contains some unresolved pressure. You may know what you think now, yet still feel the pull of the old belief.

Before drafting, answer these questions in plain language: What happened? What did I believe before it happened? What did I feel at the time? What do I see differently now? What larger human question does this moment raise?

You do not need to use each answer in the final piece. They give you raw material and prevent the essay from wandering.

Build an argument from experience

A reflective essay needs a claim. It may be quiet, but it must exist. Without one, the writing becomes a journal entry with better punctuation.

Your claim can take a form such as: “I learned that taste is partly a record of social belonging.” Or: “My fear of being misunderstood made me speak less honestly.” Or: “I treated discipline as punishment until I saw it as a form of respect for my own work.”

These are not slogans to announce in the first line. They are working ideas. As you draft, test them against the details of the event. If the claim cannot account for the scene, revise it. A good reflective essay does not use experience as decoration for a conclusion chosen in advance. It lets the experience complicate the conclusion.

This is where many essays become more interesting. You may begin convinced that a rejection taught you resilience, then realize it taught you something less flattering: you wanted approval without accepting the labor that makes approval meaningful. That admission has weight because it costs you something.

Write the scene with restraint

Give the reader a real place, a few sensory details, and a sense of movement. Then move on. Scene matters because reflection without evidence can sound detached from life.

Use details that carry emotional or intellectual pressure. The blue light of a laptop at 2 a.m. matters if it suggests isolation, obsession, or avoidance. The smell of stale coffee matters if it places the reader in the fatigue of a long night. Random description does not make prose literary. Selected description does.

Avoid explaining every feeling as it occurs. Let the scene reveal part of the feeling. “I laughed too loudly and checked my phone” may say more about discomfort than “I felt deeply uncomfortable.” Later, when you interpret the behavior, the reader will have seen the evidence first.

Restraint also protects you from melodrama. The point is not to make every moment sound historic. The point is to show why an ordinary moment carried more meaning than it first appeared to carry.

Let the present self question the past self

The most alive reflective essays contain tension between two versions of the writer. There is the person inside the event, who does not yet understand what is happening. Then there is the writer looking back, with more distance and a sharper vocabulary.

Let both appear on the page. Do not mock your earlier self from a position of superiority. That makes reflection feel finished and sterile. Treat that earlier self as someone limited by fear, desire, habit, or incomplete knowledge - someone you can recognize because that person is still partly you.

This tension gives you room for honest sentences: “At the time, I called it independence. Looking back, I can see how much of it was withdrawal.” Such turns matter because they show revision. A reflective essay is an account of revised perception.

Distance has limits, though. If the event happened yesterday, you may not have enough perspective to interpret it well. If it happened twenty years ago, memory may have smoothed away the uncertainty. Neither problem makes the subject unusable. It simply changes the task. With recent material, write cautiously. With distant material, acknowledge the gaps and resist inventing certainty.

Use philosophy as a tool, not a costume

A philosophical reference can deepen a reflective essay when it helps name a problem you have already encountered. It can weaken the piece when it arrives to make the writer sound elevated.

If a thinker, artist, or writer changed how you saw an experience, explain the encounter clearly. State the idea in your own words. Then return to your own life. The reader should never feel that a borrowed name has replaced your thinking.

The same applies to cultural commentary. A personal moment can reveal something about taste, status, performance, loneliness, or the pressure to appear certain. Make the connection carefully. One scene cannot prove a sweeping claim about everyone. It can, however, offer a precise view from one honest position.

Revise for movement

After the first draft, read it as if you were not the person who lived it. Can you identify the moment, the central question, and the change in perspective? If any one of these is missing, the essay may feel vague.

Cut background that does not shape the meaning. Replace broad statements with one observed detail. Watch for sentences that announce a lesson before the reader has earned it. Often the strongest realization belongs near the end, after the scene and the questioning have created enough pressure.

Read aloud too. Reflective writing needs rhythm, but rhythm should serve thought. If a sentence sounds impressive yet says little, remove it. Plain language can carry difficult ideas. In fact, it often carries them farther.

A finished reflective essay should leave the reader with more than your story. It should give them a clearer way to look at one corner of their own life. Write toward that shared human pressure, and let the truth of the particular moment do the work.

What Does Nietzsche Mean by Becoming Yourself?

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

When people ask, “what does Nietzsche mean,” they are usually asking how to read a writer whose sharpest lines seem to invite both freedom and disaster. Nietzsche means that a serious life requires more than accepting ready-made values: it requires examining what you admire, what you fear, and what kind of person your habits are making.

He does not offer comfort in the usual sense. He offers a demand. Stop treating your values as if they appeared from nowhere. Ask who formed them, what purpose they serve, and whether they strengthen or shrink your life.

That demand still reaches people who feel buried under borrowed opinions, empty performance, and a culture that confuses visibility with worth. Nietzsche speaks to the person who suspects that their personality has become a collection of reactions. His work asks for a harder kind of honesty.

What Does Nietzsche Mean by Value?

Nietzsche treats values as human creations, not permanent facts floating above human life. Words such as “good,” “bad,” “success,” “strength,” and “virtue” arrive with a history. They carry the desires, anxieties, resentments, and social pressures of the people who made them meaningful.

This does not mean that Nietzsche thinks nothing matters. That is one of the laziest readings of him. He thinks values matter so much that we should be suspicious of values we inherit without inspection. A person who repeats moral language without knowing why is not principled. They are often just obedient.

His method is unsettling because it turns familiar judgments into questions. Why do we praise modesty in one setting and ambition in another? Why does a person call someone arrogant when they may simply be self-possessed? Why do groups sometimes praise suffering less because it teaches anything than because it makes everyone equally small?

Nietzsche wants us to investigate these judgments at the root. He calls this a genealogy: a study of how an idea developed, what emotions fed it, and whose interests it came to serve. That practice applies far beyond philosophy. You can use it when thinking about taste, career ambition, artistic identity, friendship, or the need to be liked.

Reject easy moral labels

Nietzsche distrusts the habit of dividing people into neat moral categories. He sees human beings as mixtures of drive, contradiction, appetite, fear, tenderness, vanity, discipline, and imagination. The person who speaks most loudly about purity may be concealing a hunger for control. The person who looks selfish may be protecting the time needed to make serious work.

This is not permission to excuse harm. Nietzsche is not saying that every impulse deserves applause. He is saying that moral language often hides more than it reveals. A mature judgment asks what a behavior produces. Does it create greater clarity, strength, attention, and creative force? Or does it spread bitterness, dependency, pettiness, and self-deception?

That distinction matters for artists and young people trying to form a voice. You will be told to be authentic, then punished for becoming difficult to categorize. You will be told to stand out, then pressured to make your work resemble whatever already receives approval. Nietzsche saw this pressure clearly. The crowd often calls conformity “good sense” because it feels safer than witnessing someone make a new standard.

Understand the will to power

The phrase “will to power” has attracted plenty of crude interpretations. It does not simply mean wanting to dominate other people. Nietzsche often uses it to describe the way living beings interpret, shape, organize, and overcome resistance. It is an account of striving.

A musician practicing a passage until it stops sounding borrowed shows a form of will to power. So does a writer cutting a beautiful sentence because it weakens the truth of the piece. So does someone leaving behind a version of themselves built only to gain approval.

Power, in this sense, can mean command over your own scattered impulses. It can mean giving form to chaos. It can mean refusing to let envy decide your taste. None of this is easy, and Nietzsche would reject the sugary version of self-improvement that promises constant confidence. Growth often feels like loss at first. You lose a familiar excuse. You lose a role that once protected you. You may lose the pleasure of blaming everyone else.

There is also a trade-off. A hunger for self-formation can become vanity if it makes other people appear merely useful or inferior. Nietzsche’s language can tempt readers into posing as superior. That pose is usually a sign of insecurity. The stronger reading is more demanding: build yourself without needing to reduce everyone around you.

Take suffering seriously

Nietzsche does not praise pain for its own sake. He does not tell people to seek misery or pretend that every wound improves them. Some suffering breaks people. Some suffering is pointless. Any reading that turns pain into a badge of honor misses the human texture of his work.

What he rejects is the idea that discomfort always proves something has gone wrong. A difficult rehearsal, a failed project, a humiliating first attempt, or the loneliness of changing direction can contain information. They can expose where your abilities end and where real work begins.

For Nietzsche, the question is not, “How can I avoid every painful experience?” It is, “Can I turn what happens to me into material for a more conscious life?” There are limits to this. Loss and trauma do not become meaningful on command. Yet the question remains powerful because it returns some agency to the person who has been wounded. You may not control the event. You can still struggle over what it will make of you.

This is why his writing can feel severe and strangely encouraging at once. He refuses cheap reassurance. He also refuses to define a person by their worst hour.

Read becoming as a practice

Nietzsche’s idea of becoming yourself is often misunderstood as “just be whatever you feel like being.” He means nearly the opposite. Becoming yourself requires discipline, selection, and a willingness to discard what does not belong.

You do not discover a finished identity buried inside you like a lost object. You shape a self over time through choices, standards, relationships, work, taste, and attention. Some parts of you deserve development. Others need resistance. A person can have many desires without needing to obey all of them.

This is where Nietzsche is useful to anyone making art. Taste is not a decorative preference. Taste is judgment trained through contact with better work, closer listening, and the patience to revise your first reaction. An artist becomes recognizable by learning what to refuse.

The same holds for character. If you want a life with a distinct shape, you cannot spend every day reacting to whatever gets the loudest response. You need periods of solitude, though solitude can become sterile if it turns into contempt for ordinary people. You need standards, though standards can harden into a private prison. Nietzsche offers no clean formula because a living person has to keep adjusting the balance.

Test your life against recurrence

Nietzsche presents a demanding thought experiment often called eternal recurrence. Imagine that you had to live your exact life again, every choice and missed chance included, again and again. Would you recoil? Would you accept it? Would you change how you are living now?

You do not have to treat this as a literal claim for it to matter. Its force is practical. It interrupts the fantasy that your real life will start later, after you gain more status, more permission, or a better audience. It asks whether your daily pattern is one you could affirm rather than merely endure.

That question should not produce panic. Few people would want every detail of their life repeated. The point is to notice where you are living against your own knowledge. Maybe you keep making work you do not respect. Maybe you keep calling distraction rest. Maybe you know a friendship runs on resentment and avoid saying so.

Nietzsche does not ask you to become invulnerable. He asks you to become less divided. Make choices you can stand behind, even when they cost something.

A useful way to read Nietzsche is to keep one question close: what in me is speaking right now - fear, habit, resentment, vanity, curiosity, discipline, or a real desire to create? The answer will change. The act of asking changes a life.

What Makes Life Meaningful When Nothing Is Certain

Dess Dermondy blog home page

Dess Dermondy rock music

What makes life meaningful is not a permanent feeling of happiness or a grand explanation that removes doubt. Meaning grows when a person gives sustained attention to something beyond comfort: a craft, a relationship, a responsibility, a body of work, a standard of character.

This sounds plain because it is plain. Most people do not lose their sense of meaning because they failed to solve some abstract riddle. They lose it because their days become scattered. Their attention is rented out to noise, comparison, appetite, and the low-grade pressure to appear interesting.

A meaningful life asks for a different use of attention. It asks a person to decide what deserves their energy, then keep deciding when the novelty wears off.

Stop treating happiness as the measure

Happiness matters, but it is a poor ruler. It rises and falls with sleep, weather, money, chemistry, praise, rejection, and whether the train arrived on time. If we demand that life feel good at every turn, we make ourselves servants of conditions that no one controls.

Meaning has a harder texture. A musician may spend months working through a passage that sounds wrong in every rehearsal. A student may sit with a difficult book and realize how little they know. A friend may show up for someone in pain without having the right words. None of this is pleasant in the narrow sense. Yet these moments can leave a person with the quiet conviction that their time was properly spent.

The distinction matters. Pleasure says, "I enjoyed this." Meaning says, "This asked something real of me, and I answered."

That answer need not be dramatic. A life can be serious without becoming theatrical. Much of its meaning is built in repetitions that would look unremarkable from the outside: practicing scales, cooking for people you care about, keeping a promise, revising a page, taking a walk without filling every silence.

Choose commitments that can outlast a mood

Freedom is often marketed as an endless field of options. Keep every door open. Reinvent yourself whenever the current version becomes inconvenient. Refuse any attachment that might limit you.

This produces a strange kind of poverty. A person with no chosen limits has little shape. They can sample everything and belong nowhere. They may call that independence, while privately feeling like a guest in their own life.

Commitment gives a life contour. It tells you what to return to when your mood changes. The commitment may be to an art form, a profession, a friendship, a neighborhood, a discipline, or the slow work of becoming more truthful. What matters is that it is chosen rather than inherited blindly, and that it can withstand inconvenience.

There is a trade-off here. Commitment closes off alternatives. The guitarist who practices every evening gives up countless evenings of distraction. The writer who takes a sentence seriously will produce less than the person who treats every thought as publishable. A devoted friend cannot always remain available to every social current.

But a life made entirely of open doors becomes a hallway. You pass through it. You do not live there.

Nietzsche understood that human beings need a reason strong enough to organize suffering. His language could be severe, yet the insight remains useful: pain by itself degrades us, while pain connected to a freely chosen direction can become part of a larger effort. The point is not to glorify misery. It is to refuse the childish belief that difficulty proves something is wrong.

Build standards instead of chasing approval

Many people feel empty after getting what they thought they wanted: attention, recognition, a larger audience, proof that others noticed them. The emptiness is not mysterious. Approval is unstable, and it does not tell you whether the thing you made, said, or became has real quality.

A standard does.

Taste is one form of moral education. To develop taste is to learn the difference between what is merely loud and what lasts, between display and expression, between imitation and a voice that has earned its shape. This applies to music, clothes, conversation, work, and friendship. It is not snobbery to make distinctions. A person who cannot make distinctions is easily managed by whatever is popular this week.

Private standards protect the inner life. They let you reject a cheap opportunity even when people around you call it smart. They let you work in obscurity without treating obscurity as failure. They let you hear praise without becoming dependent on it.

Of course, standards can turn rigid. Some people use refinement as a shield against surprise, tenderness, or ordinary pleasure. The goal is not to become cold and superior. The goal is to become discerning enough that your yes means something.

Give your attention to other people

A person can have talent, discipline, and impressive opinions and still live shallowly if no one else has a real claim on them. Meaning requires contact with other lives. Not constant access. Not a public performance of care. Contact.

Friendship becomes meaningful when it moves beyond mutual entertainment. It begins when two people can tell the truth, withstand disagreement, and remain present during periods when neither person is especially impressive. This kind of friendship is rare because it demands patience and judgment. It also gives life weight.

The same is true of guidance. Younger people do not need adults who pretend to have every answer. They need people who can name what they have learned without condescension: that attention is trainable, that humiliation passes, that skill takes longer than expected, that bad taste can be corrected, that a person can start again after making a mess.

To be needed is not automatically meaningful. Need can become manipulation, and care without boundaries can hollow a person out. Yet refusing all obligation creates another form of emptiness. We become most isolated when every relationship is judged only by what it gives us.

Make something that was not there before

Creation gives meaning a visible form. A song, essay, photograph, meal, repaired chair, organized room, or carefully taught lesson says: I was here, I paid attention, and I made an alteration rather than merely consuming what arrived.

The scale does not matter much. Cultural life has trained people to think that creative work counts only when it reaches a crowd. That is a bad standard. A notebook full of honest observations may do more for a person's mind than a widely shared statement written to satisfy an algorithm. A local performance in a small room can carry more life than polished content made for approval.

Making things also forces confrontation with reality. The idea in your head is flawless. The work on the page, in the studio, or in the room is not. You must revise, listen, discard, and try again. This process humbles the ego in a useful way. It teaches that intention alone has no authority. Form matters. Practice matters. The audience, even an audience of one, can tell when you did not do the work.

Accept that meaning changes shape

There is no single answer that fits every season of a life. At one point, meaning may come from learning how to stand on your own feet. Later, it may come from giving others steadiness. A period of solitude can be honest and productive. Another period may require you to leave solitude behind before it hardens into isolation.

This is why borrowed scripts fail. Someone else may find purpose through ambition, domestic life, art, study, service, or physical challenge. Their answer can teach you something, but it cannot replace your own act of judgment. You have to ask what kind of difficulty you are willing to accept, what work you can respect after the applause fades, and which relationships make you more awake rather than less.

Meaning is less like a prize than a practice of alignment. Your actions, values, attention, and speech begin to point in roughly the same direction. Perfect consistency is impossible. Honest correction is not.

The next meaningful act may be modest: call the friend you have neglected, return to the work you keep postponing, turn off the noise long enough to hear your own mind, or make one choice that your future self will recognize as serious. Life does not announce its meaning in advance. It waits for the shape you give it.