Dess Dermondy blog home page
Dess Dermondy rock music
Schools could benefit from treating AI much like they eventually came to treat calculators: as a powerful tool that changes what should be taught rather than eliminating the need to learn. When calculators first became widely available, many educators feared students would stop learning arithmetic. Instead, schools gradually shifted their focus. Students still learned addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division by hand, but calculators allowed them to solve more complex problems and spend more time on reasoning and application.
AI presents a similar opportunity.
The key difference is that calculators automate calculation, while AI automates parts of thinking and communication. That means schools need to redefine which skills students must demonstrate independently and which skills they can perform with assistance.
For example:
-
Mental math = independent thinking. Students should still learn to write, analyze, and solve problems without AI so they understand the fundamentals.
-
Calculator = AI assistant. Once students demonstrate mastery, AI can help brainstorm ideas, explain difficult concepts, check grammar, generate practice questions, summarize research, or debug code.
Instead of asking, "Did a student use AI?" educators could ask:
-
Did the student understand the material?
-
Can they explain why the AI's answer is correct?
-
Can they identify errors the AI makes?
-
Can they improve on the AI's response?
These questions measure understanding rather than memorization.
Schools could also teach AI literacy as a core skill. Just as students learn to evaluate sources on the internet, they should learn to:
-
Write effective prompts.
-
Verify facts instead of accepting AI output at face value.
-
Recognize AI hallucinations and bias.
-
Cite AI assistance appropriately.
-
Use AI ethically and transparently.
Cheating would then be defined not by using AI itself, but by misrepresenting work. A student who copies an AI-generated essay and claims it as entirely their own is cheating, just as copying from a classmate is. A student who uses AI to brainstorm ideas, improve organization, or receive feedback is using AI as a learning tool, much like using a calculator to check mathematical work.
This approach also better prepares students for the workforce. Many professions—including engineering, software development, medicine, law, marketing, journalism, and scientific research—are increasingly integrating AI into everyday work. Graduates who know when and how to use AI responsibly will likely be better prepared than those who were taught simply to avoid it.
Ultimately, schools should aim to teach what AI cannot easily replace:
-
Critical thinking
-
Creativity
-
Ethical judgment
-
Communication
-
Collaboration
-
Problem framing
-
Independent reasoning
AI should become a tool that amplifies these abilities, not a substitute for developing them. The goal is not to produce students who can do everything without AI, nor students who depend on it for everything, but students who understand the subject well enough to use AI intelligently, question its answers, and know when its suggestions should be accepted—or rejected.
No comments:
Post a Comment